Proprietary Model

The Intent-Segmented CTR Model

Not every search means the same thing. We judge each one by what the searcher actually wanted, not just where it ranks.

A person ready to buy and a person just learning can land on the exact same search position and click very differently. This model tells them apart before deciding what normal performance looks like, so your opportunities are measured against the right expectation, not a blended average.

The Problem, In Plain Terms

Picture two people searching at the same time, both landing their search at position 3 on Google.

One types "buy motorcycle gloves." They are ready to act and will click through to a product without much hesitation.

The other types "how to clean leather gloves." They are just learning. They might read a snippet and move on, even from a great position.

If you judge both of these against one shared normal click rate for position 3, you get a number that is wrong for both of them. It makes the buyer's page look fine when it might not be, and makes the learner's page look like a failure when it is actually behaving exactly as expected.

What This Model Actually Does

Before this model calculates anything, it first works out why someone likely searched by using the actual words in their search:

Ready to buy: Words like buy, price, cheap, or discount.
Comparing options: Words like best, top, review, or versus.
Learning something: Words like how, guide, tips, or clean.
Looking for you directly: Searching your brand name with nothing else attached.
Just browsing the topic: Everything else.

Once every search is sorted this way, the model builds a separate, fair benchmark for each combination of position, brand versus non brand, and intent. A ready to buy search at position 3 is only ever compared to other ready to buy searches at position 3, never blended in with casual browsing traffic.

Why This Changes What Gets Prioritized

Without this layer, a CTR opportunity model can only tell you that a keyword is underperforming its position. With it, you also learn what kind of miss you are looking at, and that changes what the actual fix should be:

A miss on a ready to buy search: Usually points to something weak in the listing itself, such as the offer, the price, or the call to action not landing.
A miss on a learning search: Usually points to a content mismatch where the page does not answer what the searcher expected.
A miss on a brand name search: A red flag worth investigating on its own, as something may be standing between a customer and the business they already chose.

It uses the same underlying math as a standard CTR model, but the fix it points you toward is far more specific.

Why This Matters to You

Generic CTR advice treats every underperforming keyword the same way, usually recommending a title tag rewrite as a catch-all fix. That works sometimes and completely misses the mark other times. A page failing to convert someone who is ready to buy needs a different fix than a page failing to satisfy someone who is just researching.

This model exists to make sure the recommended fix actually matches the problem, so time gets spent on the right change rather than a generic one.

Back to Framework Overview

See what your traffic is actually looking for.

Get a free GSC Revenue Audit and discover where your search data is hiding measurable growth.

Get Your Free Audit